Login Form






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

What is my IP

You are connecting to this site from: 38.107.191.115

Latest Events

No Latest Events
Home arrow News arrow Local arrow FIRST DAY OF TESTIMONY IN THE LYDIA LOPEZ TRIAL
FIRST DAY OF TESTIMONY IN THE LYDIA LOPEZ TRIAL PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 1
PoorBest 
Submitted by Tux   
Thursday, 04 February 2010

 

Image
THE JUDGE DOES NOT LIKE MY SUN GLASSES

 

THE FIRST DAY OF TESTIMONY IN THE LYDIA LOPEZ TRIAL

 

Today, I attended the first day of testimony up until the afternoon recess.  Jeff Hubbins, the lead attorney for Lydia Lopez was about 45 minutes late for court due to a jack-knifed trailer on the freeway. Judge Hurl Johnson took the time to give his instructions to the Jury on what was going to happen during the trial. Jurror # 10, the foreman of the jury was excused due to economic hardship, and was replaced by another gentleman named Brent Rasmussen.

 

Jeff Hubbins arrived, and began his opening statements. He made the point that the jury only has to find that it is more likely than not to decide guilt in a civil trial, and that equal weight can be given to direct and non direct testimony in the trial. The opening statement by Hubbins began with a discussion of Lt. Pooley, who is one of the defendants in this case, who had worked for the SDEA. It was described how Lt. Pooley had placed Lydia Lopez,s hand on his penis, and how it was witnessed by a janitor who had just entered the room where they were. A second incident was described how Lydia had found a Betty Boop doll on her desk with a plastic action hero figure positioned in the “69” position on Betty Boop, and how Lt. Pooley had made some snide remark about the dolls. Another incident was described how Pooley was looking at her legs when Lydia was typing a search warrant, and that she had gone to the bathroom to change into some shorts. When she came back, Lt. Pooley told Lydia that he liked her much better with her shorts off. Jeff Hubbins described how a couple of weeks later, Lydia was transferred out of the SDEA, and put on grave yard shift. Jeff Hubbins described how this caused Lydia distress, and anxiety, and that her Doctor had prescribed Paxill for her, and had written a note that said that Lydia could not work grave yard shift for one month because of medical reasons. The county wanted two more letters from the Doctor, and eventually let her work days, but decreased her job level by two pay levels. Jeff then described how the Doctor had upped the dose of Paxill, and wanted 21 more days of day shift. The county gave her an ultimatum to work grave yard or else, so Lydia showed up. The county instituted an internal affairs investigation on Lydia’s time cards. The county found that Lydia had been cheating on her time card by marking down every day that she worked from 8 AM to 5 PM, when actual hours often differed. Jeff Hubbins told how this practice was common practice amongst other Sherrif’s Dept.  Employees, as well as employees from other county departments. Jeff referred to the practice as “Banking Hours, or Flex Time.” The county found that Lydia had cheated on the time cards, and sent her a “Notice of Termination.” The county had what is called a “Skelly Hearing” The #2 top cop Ray Hine wrote Lydia up, and placed her on a performance improvement plan rather than terminating her at that time. As a result of this meeting, Lydia had to call in whenever she was going to miss work, and personally speak to her boss, and had to sign in and out, and that her time cards had to be verified by her supervisor. Lydia found this to be impossible, because many times her supervisor was not there, since she was working nights. Lydia did not get verification on a couple of these time cards, and was found to be in violation of the terms of her performance improvement plan. Again, the county had a Skelly hearing.  Lydia was transferred out of the office, and was put on rotating shifts of 2 weeks night shift, 2 weeks day shift, and 2 weeks PM shift. Lydia gave up. Lydia is suing Bill Pooley for sexual harassment, and Stanislaus County for harassment, failure to prevent harassment, and for disability discrimination, and for failure to employ the interactive procedure that should have been followed. Lydia is also suing for lost wages

 

Loraine Jacob, the lead attorney that is defending the county, and Lt. Pooley then gave her opening statements. She stated that Lydia was feared to be a security risk in the SDEA because she is married to a documented Norteno gang member. Ms. Jacob described how Lydia had asked for overtime because her car had been repossessed, and wanted to be able to use an unmarked county car for her own use. Lydia was told NO. Loraine Jacob described how Lydia had unrestricted access to information on search warrants, informants, and that how they felt that Lydia was compromised by her money problems and being married to a documented Norteno gang member. Loraine Jacob then told of how all employees are told that they might have to work any or all shifts as necessary when hired by the county. Loraine Jacob said that the alleged penis touch incident never happened, and that Chris Martinez, the custodian will say that he was not there, and never saw the incident. Ms. Jacob also said that Lydia took 2 ½ years to complain about the sexual harassment, and witnesses will not back up Lydia’s testimony. Ms. Jacob stated that the doll incident never happened. Ms. Jacob made comments about Lydia engaging in “off color” talk at work with her co-workers, and how Lydia had sent and received sexual content E-Mails on the county computer system. Ms. Jacob stated that the evidence will show that Lydia requested night shift. Ms. Jacob said that Lydia’s doctors notes never informed the county that Lydia was suffering from depression, so the county could not be accused of mis handling her medical condition of  

 

disability. Allegations were made by Loraine Jacob that Lydia had accessed confidential information about gang member friends of her husband.

 

Jeff Hubbins then put Lydia’s Union Representative on the stand and discussed all the involvement he had in this case. This testimony was very boring, and nit picky to the extreme. I had much to do in the afternoon, and had to leave for the day. I will try to attend as much of this trial as I can. It is expected to last about three weeks.               Tux

Comments (0) add
Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.
Last Updated ( Thursday, 04 February 2010 )
 
< Prev   Next >

Polls

WHY WERE THE REPUBLICANS THUMPED?
 
DO YOU BLAME BUSH FOR IRAQ MESS?
 
SHOULD WE PULL OUT OF IRAQ SOON?
 
What Is Your Opinion Of Ray Simon?
 
SHOULD MSNBC HAVE CANCELED DON IMUS?
 
SHOULD MODESTO FUND GALLO ARTS CENTER?
 
ARE YOU SATISFIED WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF THE MODESTO CITY COUNCIL?
 

Latest Comment

PUBLIC RECORDS REQUE...
I have heard that Richard Breshears was called in ...
Ya wonder why anyone...
Jesus Christ Bill, haven\'t you had enough with th...
ATTENTION DITTO HEAD...
How can I be wrong? Even most staunch Conservative...
ATTENTION DITTO HEAD...
Your wrong Tux
TODAY ON THE MORNING...
Why would Sabatino allow someone from the Harm Red...