|
What is my IP
You are connecting to this site from: 38.107.191.90
|
Home
|
Submitted by Tux
|
|
Tuesday, 27 July 2010 |
|
 Good afternoon. I want to be fair (as always) in what I have to say today. The BEE has published several very good news stories and editorial opinions, both over time and recently. The StanCERA debacle, Village 1, several school district problems, crime, and other issues have been dealt with very well. My comment is that the BEE has missed some very critical issues, especially when Modesto City management is the issue. It simply cannot be a secret that our City is VERY poorly managed. Even when we see an apparent improvement in how the gang crime problem is being addressed by the new police chief, the fact is that his solution is working far better than the idolized former chief, who could do no wrong in the eyes of the BEE. Let us look at yesterday’s editorial. It says, “The media must continue to serve that watchdog role, as they recently did in Bell. But new hounds can’t do it alone.” I agree. That is why I, and others in leadership positions in the Stanislaus Taxpayers Association, have tried to communicate serious problems in our city and county. Let’s deal with several issues that have gone either unreported or reported inadequately. 1. My monthly water bill prior to the Nov 2004 increase was $23.08. According to my new meter, last months’ usage cost me $108.80. The STA told every one who would listen, including the mayor/council and the BEE, that water rates would triple over the next several years. We had mathematical proof. Since then, demand for water by City system users has decreased 20%, back to 1997 levels, but our rates have increased four-fold, and there is $100,000,000 in the water fund. There is so much money there, they are buying the new IT system with it. We also know they are importing administrative costs from the finance dept and others, in violation of Prop 218. The BEE ignores this story. 2. MID has published the fact that in 2010, MID will spend $4 Million on green energy. But in 2014, it will spend $43 Million on green energy. Even though MID admits that there is no mandate for “Public Owned Utilities” to ramp up green energy capacity, MID will “aggressively pursue the acquisition of green energy”. This decision will cost 10 times what current costs are, and they cheerfully admit it. 3. The McHenry solar farm is a sham. No one in his right mind would make a 25 year contract at a cost hugely in excess of current costs, on a product whose costs are plummeting. 4. The BioMass generator plant in the Beard Tract will cost MID customers a fortune. The owner of that plant’s own filed documents admit that the plant will operate out of compliance with EPA and Air Board limitations on pollutants. That plant is situated right in the heart of our City. In fact, the dog and pony show at tomorrow’s MID special meeting, is going to give grossly false information regarding both amounts of fuel available and amount of pollutants. These stories alone should be worth at least one Pulitzer. I would hope those of us who are truly engaged in civic matters would disprove the title of yesterday’s editorial. We civic minded citizens, working on our own time and money, CANNOT DO IT ALONE. We need the help of a committed newspaper, whose dedicated reporters tell our story as well as what the bureaucrats fabricate. Please, we want your help. If you cannot do that, then do not publish an opinion that fails to recognize our good work. Thank you very much, Dave Thomas, President, STA
|
|
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 27 July 2010 )
|
|
|
Submitted by Tux
|
|
Friday, 23 July 2010 |
|
 IN YOUR HEART YOU KNOW I'M RIGHT, OR IS THAT ACTUALLY LEFT? WHY NOT GIVE THE HOMELESS A PLACE TO CAMP? Tom Milam’s letter to the editor in the Modesto Bee describes a problem that exists that affects everyone in our town. Homelessness and poverty have driven people to living behind garages and in bushes. This creates a terrible mess, and potential for much worse. Homelessness in Modesto is a fact of life. Even in the best of times, we have a large number of unemployed residents. Modesto should provide a place where people can camp without the threat of eviction or arrest. Our current Modesto City Council seems bent on being tough on the poor and disadvantaged people of our community. I suggest a completely different approach. How we treat the poor is a reflection on our community, and our values. We may be just a little bit too conservative in Modesto for our own good. Let’s quit trying to make the homeless go away, and actually deal with the problem that exists. Tux
|
|
|
Submitted by Tux
|
|
Sunday, 27 June 2010 |
|
 STOP TRYING TO STEAL THIS MONEY...WE ARE WATCHING WATER FUND RIP OFF PUT ON HOLD It seems as though the Modesto City Council has found a way that they may be able to avoid the rip off from the water fund of $18 Million dollars. They just may have found a way where they can avoid using the money. Could they actually be listening to the citizens out there that are calling for them to leave the water fund untouched? I certainly hope so! I am afraid that this money that sits in the water fund is “Burning a hole in their pocket,” and that it will be raided by our elected representatives when it becomes necessary for some other need. This money is intended to be used only to accomplish our planned water upgrades, and for nothing else. Even during these hard times, our elected officials must adhere to legal standards, and do what is right for the taxpayers. Any attempt at robbing this fund will be met with stiff opposition from concerned citizens and organizations that are here to inform the public of what is really going on. Tux
|
|
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 29 June 2010 )
|
|
|
Submitted by Tux
|
|
Wednesday, 23 June 2010 |
|
 SOMEBODY OUT THERE MUST STOP THIS AS PREDICTED THE MODESTO CITY COUNCIL ROBS THE WATER FUND $18 MILLION DOLLARS Contrary to what City Manager Greg Nyhoff has stated, I believe that this will certainly lead to increased water rates in the future. Their hypocrisy knows no bounds. In this desperate financial bind the city finds itself in, it is willing to break all the rules. Who is out there guarding us against such misdeeds? Apparently not much of anyone, judging from what has been allowed to go on, and on, and on. Tux
|
|
|
Submitted by Tux
|
|
Tuesday, 22 June 2010 |
|
 MORE WILL NEVER BE ENOUGH FOR THE MID . Dear friends, we have been living under a misconception. We think that MID rates are lower than PG&E rates. They are not. Let us look at the facts. PG&E has 5 rate brackets. MID has 2 rate brackets, but will soon impose huge surcharges that they refuse to disclose. The actual rates being charged right now are these: Rate Bracket Cost per KWh PG&E MID 1. $ 0.12 $ 0.1597 (MID adds a flat charge $12.50 per month) 2. 0.13 0.1751 3. 0.29 UNKNOWN 4. 0.42 UNKNOWN 5. 0.50 UNKNOWN But enough of rates. What would you pay if you are a normal MID rate payer? MID tells us that the average monthly residential bill is for 846 KWh. I use about 1000 KWh per month. What would we pay PG&E vs. MID? Monthly Use Monthly PG&E Cost Monthly MID Cost 846 KWH $ 136.00 $ 152.93 1000 KWh 183.00 179.90 Thus, the average MID customer pays MID $16.93 more monthly than PG&E. That is $203.16 on an annual basis. BUT, MID is going to ADD A SURCHARGE to our bills, and they will not tell us what those surcharges will be. Granted, I pay MID $3.10 more now, but those surcharges will certainly cure that! Finally, I got these rates from my MID bill, and I got the PG&E rates from their web site. Please remember that PG&E is regulated by the PUC, the Federal and State governments, the SEC and their shareholders. MID is regulated by, well, no agency regulates them. PG&E must pay dividends, meaning they must over charge customers in order to pay a reasonable dividend. MID pays no dividends, thus profit is not an issue. PG&E is REQUIRED to deliver electricity to every one in their area. That includes those who live in mountains, deserts, VERY rural areas, and do on. MID must deliver electricity to those who live in areas MID chooses. So, one must ask a very simple question; “Why are MID rates higher than PG&E rates?” Thank you, Dave
|
|
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 22 June 2010 )
|
|
| | << Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
| | Results 1 - 15 of 597 |
|
|